Punishment in the Workplace
Pre-Post
For this week’s post, it is taking the gift-giving model and
flipping it to make the performance of one person below standards. I feel that it
is about digging deeper into our past experiences to learn more about punishment
behavior in and organization setting. First, by analyzing an example of moderate
punishment through our experiences and what was done to reprimand the person in
trouble. Then by seeing what the person did to fix their mistake and how the
boss tried to repair this analysis. After this analysis has been done then I
will put myself in my bosses and shoes to explain what I would have done. I
feel like this prompt was given to us to think overall about weather moderate
punishment works or if there is something else that is needed to get the
relationship to function productively. This prompt is taking the gift-giving
model and flipping it to make the performance of one person below standards.
Post
While working at Ashland one of the engineers on my team
made a big mistake with one of the orders that he had to submit to his customer. This
customer had to send the order back and this slowed down the process of that
customer, who then complained to the engineer’s boss. When the boss found out
he was very upset and called the engineer in his office where he began to yell
him for about an hour and asked him repeatedly why he thought it was okay to send
those orders even though he knew that the lot numbers were missing. He also
said that it was his fault and he needed to do something to make it right with
the customer so they would feel content with continuing their business with us.
My cubical was next to the boss's office and you could hear my boss yelling for
most of the conversation and the engineer seemed to be freighted and would
reply with short stutters. After the engineer walked out of the office you
could see how nervous he was and he seemed very scared of losing his job. For
the rest of the day, the engineer was very quiet and isolated himself in his cubical.
I was not able to ask the engineer how he felt after the conversation, but I
could tell that he was very upset at his boss and possibly himself for making
the mistake.
The following days after the scolding, I would see my boss walk over to the cubical of the engineer and
continually ask him questions about his work and to see if he was trying to fix
the mistake. I also heard my boss compliment the engineer a few times on little
tasks that he was doing. You would never really see my boss complement other
engineers on the regular so you could tell that my boss was trying to repair
the relationship. My boss also offers the engineer extra help with getting his
work down and would give him less work to make sure he had enough time to
complete the tasks the engineer had at hand. My boss kept emphasizing to the
engineer to take his time and do the job correctly rather than fast.
If I were in my boss's shoes I would have handled the
situations differently. I feel like punishments in the workplace can be toxic,
especially if there is confrontation/ embracement involved. The fact that the
whole office knew that the engineer was being yelled at was not okay because it
vocalized to the office that he made that mistake. Instead, I would politely
tell the engineer to fix the mistake and ask him to ensure that a mistake like
that did not occur again. I would also ask the engineer reasons as to why he
thought he might have made that mistake and what he could do to improve himself
to ensure it does not happen again. By acting this way it advocates for the
growth of an employee rather than belittling the employing and embarrassing
that employee. The manager who competed with my manager had a different
style of management and used positive reinforcement to gain results. His team
was a lot more effective than our team and I think that was because he treated
his workers with respect. The engineers on his team felt as if they were equal
rather than his boss and that allowed them to solve engineering problems fast
than our team. That positive work environment also allowed them to grow and those
workers stayed with the team a lot longer. Our team, on the other hand, had more of
a turnover rate than the other team. Therefore, I think that punishment should
be avoided in the workplace and focusing on mistakes as a learning opportunity
for growth should be embraced.
Next week when we study conflict in organizations, you might want to reconsider this example. In particular, if your boss was genuinely angry at the engineer, can that anger be bottled up? Or must it surface somehow? So in considering this, you should ask who is making the decisions - the rational self or the emotional self. In the ideal world it may be that the emotional vents after work hours and in a place where the rest of the office doesn't see the behavior. Of course, we don't always get a chance to live in an ideal world.
ReplyDeleteThe thing is, if you are not an angry person most of the time, then you will calm down eventually and the venting is part of the process in calming down. This suggests the person's own preferences will be time inconsistent - one thing when very angry, and quite another thing after having calmed down where rationality has returned.
The way you told the story, maybe your boss should have apologized to the rest of the office. But he might not have perceived the need in doing that. This is where feedback from trusted employees is critical - not an intern, but rather somebody who has been there for a while who can tell truth to power. Was there anybody you knew in your workgroup at Ashland who could have done that?
Thanks for your reply. I would say that my boss was generally an angry person when you did something wrong but was also very nice to you if you didn't make mistakes. Overall, I think many of the engineers under him were somewhat afraid of him but also had the ability to stand up for themselves. The engineer who was being yelled at was somewhat awkward socially and many people seemed to kind of walk all over him.
ReplyDelete